Idolatry

July 29, 2007

Randy discussed idolatry today. I agree many who criticize him have idolatry or had it. And some have yet to make Jesus Lord and are filled with bitterness.

Randy compared this to a football player who clipped him, of whom he idolized. He asked was it the football players error that he clipped him, which caused Randy to see the truth?

This is a deceptive question. Because they both erred.

There are people who are so bitter and angry at Randy, they do indeed live in sin and hatred and produce much of the flesh. This is why I am not involved in the other forum where many ex-CiMers have participated. But Randy ignores the fact that elders must be blameless.

Randy is so quick to follow this:

1Cor:5:11: But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

but is slow to obey this:

1 Tim 3:2  A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;

Titus 1:
6  If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.
7:  For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not selfwilled, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre;

Why is this? He confessed it today. He doesn’t want to be distracted from Lordship. This is wrong.

Math 23:23: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye … have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

Luke11:42: But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye … pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

Randy also discussed the idea that many are offended about his ministering to the women. It is true there is controversy about this. And I think both sides need to calm down and step back. Much of this problem would be understood if we realized who was reaching these women. It’s Randy, who has caused divorces and families to be broken up.

The question of whether a minister should take other wives camping is now secondary. Because Randy is disqualified from doing it at all.

But this is an issue which is hotly dividing 2 sides. I won’t choose a side on this. Randy said he has brought other men and his wife along so there wouldn’t be any improper temptations or appearance of evil. I cannot confirm or deny this. However if a qualified elder of a proper ministry offered a camping trip for women, and they had qualified men involved where no man by himself was with the women alone, I would say such an outing would be fine.

It I think is contested whether Randy actually had other men with him. I do not know. Perhaps their are 2 problems here. Those men who wouldn’t trust any ministry with their wives and Randy’s disqualification.

Since we are not discussing a legitimate qualified elder, the whole problem of whether such an outing is proper is moot. It simply does not matter. Randy shouldn’t be doing this, and the wives shouldn’t be trusting him, and the husbands and fathers shouldn’t allow it.

Randy mentioned these contested problems on the internet. And since I have not spoken about the concerns of headship vs lordship, I now know he is speaking about the other forum, where such discussions have been discussed.

Some would say that I and others who are following Christ should ignore that forum or those who are in the flesh. That is an extreme position of 1 Cor 5:11 quoted above. Scripture doesn’t say to abandon them, but not to keep company or eat with them.

There is a time where one may cut off all ties, such as when Paul did with the man who slept with his step-mother in Corinthians. There is such a line. Randy himself spoke only a week or 2 ago that sometimes you have a limited voice to those who have gone astray. There are those who have that limited voice, but my voice is not accepted at all over there any more, so I don’t have a choice.

Therefore, I am not going to denounce those that do love God and have some voice and try to still minister to such folk. In fact I wish they would use their voice more often. But its not for me to determine that as I am neither head nor lord.

I want to discuss another aspect of idolatry Randy did not mention. Though he asked was it the fault of the one being idolized? Many times no, but with some cases there is a joint blame in that sin.

Evidence #1: Randy’s message called “Kisser/Cleaver”

Randy created idolatry with his message of “Kisser/Cleaver”. He made men forget the Lordship of Jesus and His call on their lives by telling folks that those who kiss Randy and CiM and leave are not sons!

Evidence #2: the control of weddings. Randy made men believe that Randy was in control when he made it the administrations choice of who gets married to who.

Evidence #3: a former elder claims Randy said this: (loose quote) “Here’s how it works:  God tells me His will for you - and then I will let you know what it is.” 

Evidence #4: the administration made threats of harm to those who leave. There were stories told about how many people were in accidents and hurt when they left Marshall.

Randy and the administration has a history of making the sheep believe that the eldership was the authority and will of God.

When God originally told me to go to CiM, it was going to be for school only, but Randy’s messages and his method made me believe God wanted me to stay at CiM. He made me think that they were the voice of God’s will and direction for my life.

Randy has violated Lordship and Headship and has crossed the line of shepherding, whether he wants to admit it or not. While men have not lost free will and will be judged for their idolatry if not repented of, Randy and his team will also be judged for dropping this offense on the sheep.

Is there scripture stating Randy or any minister will share responsibility? Yes!

Luke 17:

1: Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!
2: It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

James 3:1: My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.

1 Cor 3:

12: Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;
13: Every man’s work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is.
14: If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
15: If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
16: Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
17: If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

Math 18:

6: But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
7: Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!

Randy is so quick to abandon those who have idoltry, so should we be quick to obey the scripture about those who cause it? Lets continue what Matthew says:

Math 18:

8: Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire.
9: And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.

Such would be an extreme, but we must take the whole message:

10: Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.
11: For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
12: How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray?
13: And if so be that he find it, verily I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that sheep, than of the ninety and nine which went not astray.
14: Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.

And thus we come to the proceedure to deal with those who have done wrong:

15: Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
16: But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
17: And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.

And so we see that Matthew 18 has alot to say on the subject, and verse 17 is where we are with Randy. This is done 2 fold, to help the sheep from being hurt and hope that Randy will repent.


More about going Upwards

July 25, 2007

In an ideal setting going upwards is good, but not always necessary. If someone has a problem with a church’s administration they should 1st go privately to them. And then follow the Biblical standard about correcting elders.

As for CiM and Randy, the Biblical method has already been followed and they have been deemed dangerous and disqualified. Therefore folks should stop supporting Randy’s ministry and just leave.

Any attempt to allow him or the administration to help someone with a problem may in fact make it worse!


More on last Sunday’s service

July 25, 2007

It was mentioned, I think by Tom, that folks with problems should go upward. In theory this would work, unless the chain of command is corrupt. Or if the problem you have is upwards.

When I was having my troubles in Marshall I indeed went to the administration for help. I did everything they asked me to do, until very late after they refused to help.

I even followed the Isaac principle of letting something die and let God raise it. I had asked this young lady to marry me and she said no. It was hard afterwards for awhile but I let it go and completely gave up the notion, I mean what else could I do? She said no, so I went on with my life and served God. Several months later we continued our friendship where it had been before I had proposed. And we became good friends again. And there it stayed. I did not induce or encourage or even hope for more. I had let it die. Then one day she asked me why I had asked her to marry me. I explained that I thought it was a Godly match, I don’t remember all I said. But the conversation turned to marriage and kids in general, not about us, but just our expectations and desires about family in the future. And we both were surprised that we both wanted a son named Derek.

Somehow that conversation changed her.  Her heart turned to me. A short time after that we went to the elders to ask them to marry us. And they refused.

And that’s when all the trouble began. They had no legitimate reason to not marry us, I had even followed their teaching about the Isaac principle. They tried to be cool and proper about it and asked us to separate for awhile. A thing we had already done, but I agreed to do so. Things became a bit rocky but in the end she wanted to marry me, but then they refused again. Her mother told me to take her daughter to another church to get married, and she was willing. But my stance was, to wait for the elders of CiM to do it or I wasn’t gonna do it.

I am not gonna get into the teachings of who we should marry or not, nor the stance that I am glad we didn’t get married later. None of that is relative. Some may claim it is if the marriage is not God ordained. While I will not get into such things here, I do not believe there is a specific mate for us created by God. While the church in Marshall would have us believe that we should abandon jobs and family to go to an ordained church by God, I disagree. God may call us to a place, a city. And that city may have a church that will be a blessing to us, God I don’t think is ordaining families to uproot themselves for a local assembly. Nor do I think there is a specific job for us. Marriage is about soul mates. The soul is not the spirit. Therefore it is not a divinely inspired singularity. God may be in a marriage, God may bless a marriage but its about compatibility of the soul. Enough on that.

I had a choice, she had a choice, and they refused us that choice. My error was being a man pleaser, and making men my Lord rather than Christ. They couldn’t even tell me why or what was wrong. The more I tried to work with them, the more wrong they became.

Was I selling my inheritance? That’s what they would claim, but the man of God whom Randy had chosen to oversee his ministry came to minister with 2 other men at CiM, and one of them prophesied over me at that very time that I was not selling my inheritance and that God was pleased with me.

Go up the ladder? Yes, if it’s Jesus. But not necessarily so if it’s men in error. And let us remember those men may even be disqualified from even being there!

By the way I am not discounting that God may call people to a specific church. I am not saying that it is a theology that every person in the planet is God ordained to move to another city to go to a specific church. Scripture simply does not back that up. Do we see people in the book of Acts moving to a city because God ordained it? We see God telling ministers to go to cities to preach. All such doctrines should have Biblical examples.

I know of another case years ago where a man when to the elders about a concern he had about his wife, about something she might do. They let it go, and did nothing about it. And then later the husband’s concerns had become real.

I wouldn’t trust the CiM eldership with any concern’s of import. They have been disqualified.

Why are they disqualified? See here:

http://kingdomgospel.wordpress.com/why-randy-is-disqualified/


The Full Restoration of the Church

July 25, 2007

I have spoken about it, I refer to it as the Latter Reign/Rain as seen here:

 http://kingdomgospel.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/latter-rainkingdom-reign/

and here:

http://www.kingdom-gospel.com/latter.html

God revealed something to me I never saw before. Jesus set up the apostles and prophets which built the church:

Eph 2:20
And are built upon the foundation of the
apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself
being the chief corner stone;

We know that Paul told Timothy to teach those after him the same things, but somewhere along the line the church failed to obey this command.

2 Timothy 2:2  And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.

Thus the dark ages came upon mankind. Martin Luther and others began restoring some of these truths and thus the church has been regaining much that was lost.

The final stage would be the setup and authority of apostles and prophets. While apostles and prophets exist, their authority has yet to be accepted universally. If it took Christ to set this up the 1st time, it will take Christ a 2nd time. However when He comes around the next time, He will be taking those prepared with Him. Those unprepared, even in the church, will be left behind. This shaking will purify the church and establish the apostolic and the prophetic authority of the church. As those unprepared in the church will turn to one of 2 groups, the tribulation saints and the apostate church which becomes the one world religion.

To learn about the partial rapture go here:

http://www.kingdom-gospel.com/prepare.html

Some think that the full restoration is an end which we shuld be striving for. It is not. the church is a transatory position. We are ambassadors, who live here temporarily representing Christ:

2Cor:5:20: Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God.

Thus it is rediculous that many ministers are so eager to be a factor in bringing about the Latter Reign. Many men of God however were partakers of bringing about restoration and revelation lost from the dark ages and before, but it will be Christ’s return to the atmosphere which will bring about the shaking and restoring of the apostles and prophets.

Heb 12:

25: See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven:
26: Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.
27: And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

Those who escape (verse 25) will not be a part of it.  And then once those things in the church which are removed because they are not of God, then all that hindered the authority of the prophets and apostles will be restored.

And yes there are apostles and prophets who will not be ready. But there also will be new ones, those who will get saved after the rapture.

For more about the apostate church becoming the one world religion go here:

http://www.kingdom-gospel.com/apostasy.html